After a long long time!!!
Life has changed a lot in the past few years. Lost the login details for this and just got it back..
I will now post something or the other soon!!!!!!!!!!!
This is about Srikant, for Srikant, by Srikant for anyone who cares to read this. Nothing exciting, just a few musings about me, my thoughts, my past, my present and my future. My thoughts, dreams, sucesses, failures, regrets, friends and so on and so forth.
Duffy - Mercy Lyrics
Yeah, yeah, yeah
I love you
But I gotta stay true
My moral’s got me on my knees
I’m begging please
Stop playing games
I don’t know what this is
But you got me good
Just like you knew you would
I don’t know what you do
But you do it well
I’m under your spell
You got me begging you for mercy
Why won’t you release me
You got me begging you for mercy
Why won’t you release me
I said you better release me
Now you think that I
Will be some thing on the side
But you got to understand
That I need a man
Who can take my hand, yes I do
I don’t know what this is
But you got me good
Just like you knew you would
I don’t know what you do
But you do it well
I’m under your spell
You got me begging you for mercy
Why won’t you release me
You got me begging you for mercy
Why won’t you release me
I said you better release me
I’m begging you for mercy
Just why won’t you release me
I’m begging you for mercy
You got me begging
You got me begging
You got me begging
Mercy
Why won’t you release me
I’m begging you for mercy
Why wont you release me
You got me begging you for mercy
I’m begging you for mercy
I’m begging you for mercy
I’m begging you for mercy
I’m begging you for mercy
Why won’t you release me
Bring it on
Mercy
Begging you for mercy
You got me begging
Down on my knees
I said mercy
Begging you for mercy
You got me begging
Duffy - Mercy Song Info
Released February 25, 2008 (U.K.)
Recorded 2008
Genre Pop, Soul
Length 3:41
Label A&M Records
Background voice:
You make me think as I don’t care
Because you don't know what I got and
I wanna get more than I’m asking for
but I just don't want to waste my time
you think that I better let it go
just like there’s nothing in this world
I know that I gonna play this song
like I just don't know anything at all

Brilliant water-based eyeglasses for the masses: No optician required
British inventor Josh Silver, a former professor of physics at Oxford University, has come up with a game-changer of a product design with his water-lensed glasses.
Silver has devised a pair of glasses which rely on the principle that the fatter a lens the more powerful it becomes. Inside the device's tough plastic lenses are two clear circular sacs filled with fluid, each of which is connected to a small syringe attached to either arm of the spectacles.The wearer adjusts a dial on the syringe to add or reduce amount of fluid in the membrane, thus changing the power of the lens. When the wearer is happy with the strength of each lens the membrane is sealed by twisting a small screw, and the syringes removed. The principle is so simple, the team has discovered, that with very little guidance people are perfectly capable of creating glasses to their own prescription.
You can mass-produce millions of these, rather than manufacturing myriad individual lenses each tuned to a user's specific vision deficiencies. And while the one-size-fits-all mentality may not fly in developed nations, Silver's goal is to help the hundreds of millions of people in developing countries who suffer from poor eyesight.
Silver calls his flash of insight a "tremendous glimpse of the obvious"--namely that opticians weren't necessary to provide glasses. This is a crucial factor in the developing world where trained specialists are desperately in demand: in Britain there is one optometrist for every 4,500 people, in sub-Saharan Africa the ratio is 1:1,000,000.The implications of bringing glasses within the reach of poor communities are enormous, says the scientist. Literacy rates improve hugely, fishermen are able to mend their nets, women to weave clothing. During an early field trial, funded by the British government, in Ghana, Silver met a man called Henry Adjei-Mensah, whose sight had deteriorated with age, as all human sight does, and who had been forced to retire as a tailor because he could no longer see to thread the needle of his sewing machine. "So he retires. He was about 35. He could have worked for at least another 20 years. We put these specs on him, and he smiled, and threaded his needle, and sped up with this sewing machine. He can work now. He can see."
So far 30,000 of Silver's specs have been distributed, but more are on the way; his eventual target is 100 million pairs.
For more info:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/dec/22/diy-adjustable-glasses-josh-silver
Labels: water-based eyeglasses
Labels: Emo Philips
Labels: Hyderabad
Labels: Self-powering cell phone
In the meanwhile, let us hope that someone creates a cheaper way of Wastewater treatment and desalination plants. Look at this news. This talks about Middle East, but I personally believe it will be true for all over the world.
Labels: Desalination

But the bigger news this week is:
A gadget which makes water out of thin air
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/008200811241520.htm
Using the same technology as a de-humidifier, the Water Mill is able to create a supply of drinking water by capturing it from an unlimited source - the air.
The machine draws in moist air through a filter and over a cooling element which condenses it into water droplets. It can produce up to 12 litres a day.
The Water Mill will also generate more water when storms pass over, as the humidity in the air rises. In keeping with its ecodevelopment, the machine uses the same amount of electricity as three light bulbs.
Its maker, Canadian firm Element Four, estimates a litre of water will cost about 50c to produce.
This when it reaches the common people and becomes a bit cheaper, will be a huge boon for mankind.
Labels: Water out of Thin Air
This looks like a very big week for the world.
For people who missed these:
Here is an invention to generate Electricity from Ocean Currents:
http://www.examiner.com/x-243-Progressive-Politics-Examiner~y2008m11d30-wave-power
http://greeninc.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/01/rivers-looking-attractive-for-energy-again/?hp
And..a proposal for Offshore wind power
This certainly looks good.
Let us hope that the invention reaches the common mankind real fast.
Labels: The Team
Labels: Mumbai
Labels: Jitendra
INA Veterans and Netaji
During my travels, I once met an old man, a Freedom Fighter and an INA Veteran.
He told me, he still dreamt of an
He is a Tamilian who joined the INA heeding the call of Rash Behari / Netaji and saw action in
When they initially came back to
Just imagine, soldiers coming from traumatic battles and battlefields, already depressed by war, being subject to non recognition. They were dishonorably discharged from an army that refused to accept them even after
It was only in 1972, that the government found it fit to award a pension to the INA Veterans. I wonder why this discrimination happened at all. Why were these guys pushed to the gutters of society?
A lot many people claim that Netaji was alive and lived in
Varun.
He is one my first cousins and his Dad is/was very close to me when I was growing up. I met him after a long time. May not be correct. But I truly saw him for the first time only in this trip to
He is one cool dude. Atleast that is what I think. :)
How I long for those days, when I was the rebel. :) That age, when you beieve that everything will just fall in place if you make a go for it. You feel you are the king and the world is before you just waiting to be conquered. When you dream that making billions is just a matter of time. When you believe that you know what is right and what is wrong. When you believe that the world is in general Black and white with a few shades of grey, but you know how to conquer that grey shade.
Aahh!! What I would give, just to have those days back. When you are the idealistic person and not drawn back by practical daily compulsions of life.
caritra irukulalO irukkunna irusulu.
prajA taamasamlO paDi lEvalEni pAmarulu.
ప్రజా తామసమ్లో పడి లేవలేని పామరులు.
This is something I read a long time back and just remember it. Don’t even remember who said it or in what context.
Literally, I think it translates to:
Spokes stuck in the cracks of history
Peasants who can’t stand up against the huge wave of humanity.
Today morning I woke up thinking about my school days and people I knew from school. Why? When coming back from
School days are supposed to be the best in one’s life. But is it true for everyone? If they were so great, and if everyone has so much fun then, I suppose each and every person has a huge cache of friends from those days. I think when most of us go to reunions; we go to gloat or feel remorseful about ourselves when compared to others or just to meet up old acquaintances from those days, or for what ever reasons. Very few times do we meet to go back to catch a very old friend and maintain contact with that person from that point on. Moreover, the caustic relationship we shared with people those days still resides in some corner of our memories and we still hesitate to frankly interact with those we meet in the reunions. As we grow older we grow more cynic and more …..
I personally feel that my school years were a really bad phase of my life. It was because of a combination of many things. No proper guidance was the main thing, I suppose. But overall, all I remember from school was that I was a failure in studies and did a lot of idiotic things and so on. I was a huge sympathizer of the left those days and was also politically very opinionated. But there was no proper guidance for my thoughts nor my actions. In school, all it resulted in was some warnings from the principal, or teachers. At home, my Dad who was a very strict disciplinarian those days (he still is in some ways), would just scold or worst case slap me once or twice. But no one knew what I was going through or (I am not sure) if they even understood the gravity of things.
I knew after my 10th that I was not in the bottom percentile in studies when compared to my peers and was actually on the higher end. But, till my 10th, my marks were real bad. Once I scored half a mark out of 100 in Physics. :) And in college Physics was one of my best subjects. I failed Telugu in my 9th finals and later in college and afterwards, I was writing poetry, drama and songs in Telugu. So sad.
Ok, back to the first sentence and its correlation to school. There are people who just stick in some corner of your mind / memories. Just like in my essay “Vaise bhi itnaa gham .........” You do not know what they are doing, where they are now, and so on. But you still are a little bit curious. I was thinking about some of the people I knew in School and was wondering how life was treating them.
:)

This was the main shop for Hollywood footwear. People at one time used to swear by the variety and quality you could get here. Abids again.
Karachi bakery opposite the Mozamzahi Market

The streets of Hyderabad on a Sunday. This is in Abids, where you can buy books at a huge discount. Lot of 2nd hand books and also new ones. If you are patient, you can own some rare ones. See those signs, any book for 10 or 20 bucks.
This is Abids GPO. You see Nehru stading there with the bird in his hand. Just in front of the bus. Ramakrishna Theatres are behind the GPO. Go left from here, you go to Koti, a sharp right takes you to Nampally Railway Station. I am not sure if we can go to Mozamzahi market from the right, as I believe it is a one way.
Abids Roads. Yeah they sell clothes also on the streets on sundays. I think they are either factory seconds or something. But you can get good branded clothes for under 100 Indian Bucks.
Books, Books, Books
Careers and growth!
Why does everyone want you to become a Manager or a C level person in an Organization? Is that the only path one can take in Life?
Every time someone asks me about my career I find myself defending the job I am doing. Indians and Chiefs are both required to get a job done. Some people remain foot soldiers, some become the Chiefs, some choose to be what they like to be. I believe that, a manager in general has way too many responsibilities and has way too many headaches. Being a regular foot soldier, (in my case specifically, a Contractor) does not make me lose out on the pay scale when compared to a Manager. It also affords me far fewer headaches than what a Manager faces, lesser responsibilities and more time to pursue what interests me more. :) Like right now, writing this….
Being in a routine job is tiresome. You always report to one person or more, stay in one town, and it slowly becomes a bore. Freelancing, on the other hand, makes you learn your subject, affords you to travel more easily, helps you escape office politics, and you are free to choose your own job. The day I start hating my client or my manager, I can just say good bye. The day I want a vacation, I can go for a vacation without thinking about the vacation time and all such things. The day I want to work more or less, I know I can do the work as needed and will be compensated as such.
So which is better? If you don’t mind the traveling, let’s free lance. :)
Barbers in
I have been going to this barber right from childhood. When we were children, me, my brother, and my dad, all of us used to go to this guy. He used to be only guy those days in this area I suppose. He was very popular with the adults those days. When I was a teenager, I changed loyalties and used to go to this guy nearer to our house. This was because, this new barber was nearer to our age and had all these filmi magazines lying around, and was ok with us smoking in the shop. :) This was our main reason. Filmi magazines and Smoking. Then I left for the
Now this barber from my childhood, he thinks, no, not thinks, he is convinced that we have to listen to him since he knows us from childhood. So he is the quintessential authoritative figure we keep encountering in
And this ‘Original’ barber, the old guy, he feels he has a proprietary hold over (atleast) my hair and my beard. Today I went to get a haircut done. And the kid was attending me. I was like the first customer of the day. The dad comes in to the shop, as the kid was about to start on me. And he says, where did you get your last haircut? It is so bad. Don’t those idiots know how to properly do a haircut and so on. Come on!! What can I say? I just go to a barbers’ shop and ask for a haircut. Close my eyes and open them, and Lo and Behold it gets done. Yeah, most of them are fresh out of Barber school, but that’s the way most of the chain places are. If we are lucky, we get an experienced person, if not, a green horn, thinking if they have to use a scissors or a machine? Should they cut it a bit, a lot and so on and so forth. It did pain me getting a haircut in the beginning when I was new to US but now, I am just used to it. If it is done bad, will bear it for a few days till the hair grows back rather than argue with them.
Then the kid starts my haircut (finally!!), and after he is done a quarter, the ‘dad’ starts, this the way you do?? You are going too short? Early in the morning, still sleepy, I was really pissed. :( I was about to give him a piece of my mind, but he went off to get some tea and I was left in peace.
But still on the over all, I love going to a barber shop and getting a shave and a light massage.
Ranting about
Yesterday, went out to buy some books in Abids. Shanti and Varun (my uncle’s kids) also accompanied me. After buying the books, I said let us go and have some ice cream. So I took them to Famous Ice cream in Mozamjahi Market and ordered Seetaphal ice cream. This is the season for Seetaphal (custard apple) and is one of my favorite fruits. That is one fruit I do not mind eating at any time. Unfortunately, I haven’t been here in the season to get to eat in the past 10 yrs or so. And Famous Ice cream is really famous and is one of
This is so sad!! These kids were born and spent all their life around
All they know is
History in general is such a neglected topic in life. Today I was telling Amrusha (one of my nieces) some stories from the Ramayana and the Mahabharata and in general history of AP. I was very glad that she was at least partly interested in those stories and asked some good questions. I never had anyone tell me any stories in my childhood. I had to read them up myself from the comics and up. Just for that reason, I always feel like I missed out on a lot when someone tells me their parents or grand parents tell them stories and so on. My parents were always behind us to study and study. I hated it so much. Why are parents in general so fixated on Math and Science? Why does everyone expect their offspring to become Engineers or Doctors? They are even ready to pay such huge fees for that. Don’t they realize that, those kids who do their Engineering and Medicine by spending so much, might actually harm the country and population more??
All these Engineers, coming out of college and they do not know even the basics of a circuit or basic conversions. It makes me so sad to see that our education system has become so skewed. God help people who go to those Doctors who have a degree but no brains. There is no awareness about other careers outside the Sciences. Why doesn’t the media create awareness about those other options available for people? Everyone wants to be a computer graduate. No one wants to invest time in research or history or even statistics for that matter.
Oh my country! I weep for thou!!
Lousy politicians, lazy bureaucrats,
Greedy and corrupt,
They vie for ruining you the first.
Illiterate and an ignorant populace,
Who have a hazy idea about you and freedom,
Who do not care about you!
Oh my country!
Camouflaged by darkness,
Hunger, as bright as lightning
Ignorance, as loud as thunder.
Corruption seems like heavy rain,
And poverty is like deep floods!
Forget the past, leave today behind
Lets imagine a new future and a new beginning.
Lets look forward to that glorious future where
Its sunlight all around you and everyone is happy!!
I suppose the airports today are the new Railway Stations. I have been hearing about and even watched 2 or 3 movies showing the same concept, most notably The Terminal starring Tom Hanks. But, I never really believed in it.
Today I was traveling from
Hey! Btw, I really got screwed by the airline guys. It seems I am only allowed a baggage allowance of 20 kgs. And I had 28 kgs. They made me pay almost 400 euros for those 8 kgs, which were basically unwashed clothes. So sad. I wonder if I will get remimbursed for it. And, what do these idiots think that you can carry in a 20 kg limit? Especially on an International Flight. The governments and the big corporations of
Thankfully not one face I know on the
The following is a list of some moral dilemmas, mostly adapted from Moral Reasoning, by Victor Grassian (Prentice Hall, 1981, 1992), with a couple additions. The question to consider with all of these is why they are dilemmas. Some, however, may not seem to be dilemmas at all.
In 1842, a ship struck an iceberg and more than 30 survivors were crowded into a lifeboat intended to hold 7. As a storm threatened, it became obvious that the lifeboat would have to be lightened if anyone were to survive. The captain reasoned that the right thing to do in this situation was to force some individuals to go over the side and drown. Such an action, he reasoned, was not unjust to those thrown overboard, for they would have drowned anyway. If he did nothing, however, he would be responsible for the deaths of those whom he could have saved. Some people opposed the captain's decision. They claimed that if nothing were done and everyone died as a result, no one would be responsible for these deaths. On the other hand, if the captain attempted to save some, he could do so only by killing others and their deaths would be his responsibility; this would be worse than doing nothing and letting all die. The captain rejected this reasoning. Since the only possibility for rescue required great efforts of rowing, the captain decided that the weakest would have to be sacrificed. In this situation it would be absurd, he thought, to decide by drawing lots who should be thrown overboard. As it turned out, after days of hard rowing, the survivors were rescued and the captain was tried for his action. If you had been on the jury, how would you have decided?
You are an inmate in a concentration camp. A sadistic guard is about to hang your son who tried to escape and wants you to pull the chair from underneath him. He says that if you don't he will not only kill your son but some other innocent inmate as well. You don't have any doubt that he means what he says. What should you do?
In the novel Sophie's Choice, by William Styron (Vintage Books, 1976 -- the 1982 movie starred Meryl Streep & Kevin Kline), a Polish woman, Sophie Zawistowska, is arrested by the Nazis and sent to the Auschwitz death camp. On arrival, she is "honored" for not being a Jew by being allowed a choice: One of her children will be spared the gas chamber if she chooses which one. In an agony of indecision, as both children are being taken away, she suddenly does choose. They can take her daughter, who is younger and smaller. Sophie hopes that her older and stronger son will be better able to survive, but she loses track of him and never does learn of his fate. Did she do the right thing? Years later, haunted by the guilt of having chosen between her children, Sophie commits suicide. Should she have felt guilty?
A fat man leading a group of people out of a cave on a coast is stuck in the mouth of that cave. In a short time high tide will be upon them, and unless he is unstuck, they will all be drowned except the fat man, whose head is out of the cave. [But, fortunately, or unfortunately, someone has with him a stick of dynamite.] There seems no way to get the fat man loose without using [that] dynamite which will inevitably kill him; but if they do not use it everyone will drown. What should they do?
| Railroad Safety | ||
|---|---|---|
| year | billions of passenger miles | fatalities per billion passenger miles |
| 1890 | 11.8 | 24.2 |
| 1900 | 16.0 | 15.5 |
| 1910 | 32.3 | 10.0 |
| 1920 | 47.4 | 4.8 |
| 1930 | 26.9 | 2.3 |
| 1939 | 22.7 | 1.8 |
| 1943 | 87.9 | 3.2 |
| 1950 | 31.8 | 0.6 |
| 1970 | 10.8 | 0.07 |
An underwater tunnel is being constructed despite an almost certain loss of several lives [actually, all but certain]. Presumably the expected loss is a calculated cost that society is prepared to pay for having the tunnel ["society" doesn't make any such calculation]. At a critical moment when a fitting must be lowered into place, a workman is trapped in a section of the partly laid tunnel. If it is lowered, it will surely crush the trapped workman to death. Yet, if it is not and a time consuming rescue of the workman is attempted, the tunnel will have to be abandoned and the whole project begun anew. Two workmen have already died in the project as a result of anticipated and unavoidable conditions in the building of the tunnel. What should be done? Was it a mistake to begin the tunnel in the first place? But don't we take such risks all the time?
In Victor Hugo's Les Miserables, the hero, Jean Valjean, is an ex-convict, living illegally under an assumed name and wanted for a robbery he committed many years ago. [Actually, no -- he is only wanted for breaking parole.] Although he will be returned to the galleys -- probably [in fact, actually] for life -- if he is caught, he is a good man who does not deserve to be punished. He has established himself in a town, becoming mayor and a public benefactor. One day, Jean learns that another man, a vagabond, has been arrested for a minor crime and identified as Jean Valjean. Jean is first tempted to remain quiet, reasoning to himself that since he had nothing to do with the false identification of this hapless vagabond, he has no obligation to save him. Perhaps this man's false identification, Jean reflects, is "an act of Providence meant to save me." Upon reflection, however, Jean judges such reasoning "monstrous and hypocritical." He now feels certain that it is his duty to reveal his identity, regardless of the disastrous personal consequences. His resolve is disturbed, however, as he reflects on the irreparable harm his return to the galleys will mean to so many people who depend upon him for their livelihood -- especially troubling in the case of a helpless woman and her small child to whom he feels a special obligation. He now reproaches himself for being too selfish, for thinking only of his own conscience and not of others. The right thing to do, he now claims to himself, is to remain quiet, to continue making money and using it to help others. The vagabond, he comforts himself, is not a worthy person, anyway. Still unconvinced and tormented by the need to decide, Jean goes to the trial and confesses. Did he do the right thing?
Roger Smith, a quite competent swimmer, is out for a leisurely stroll. During the course of his walk he passes by a deserted pier from which a teenage boy who apparently cannot swim has fallen into the water. The boy is screaming for help. Smith recognizes that there is absolutely no danger to himself if he jumps in to save the boy; he could easily succeed if he tried. Nevertheless, he chooses to ignore the boy's cries. The water is cold and he is afraid of catching a cold -- he doesn't want to get his good clothes wet either. "Why should I inconvenience myself for this kid," Smith says to himself, and passes on. Does Smith have a moral obligation to save the boy? If so, should he have a legal obligation ["Good Samaritan" laws] as well?
The cast of Seinfeld, Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer, have a layover in a small New England town. They witness a robbery in broad daylight. The robber has his hand in his pocket, and the victim shouts that the man has a gun. As soon as the robber runs away, a policeman appears on the scene; but instead of pursuing the robber, he arrests Jerry, Elaine, George, and Kramer for having violated the new "Good Samaritan" law of the town. Since the four of them spent the time of the robbery making fun of the victim, who was fat, their role in the matter doesn't look good, and at their trial everyone who has ever felt wronged by them in the course of the television series testifies against them. They are convicted. Is this just? What were they supposed to do during the robbery? Should they have rushed the robber, just in case he didn't really have a gun?
Tom[/Jane], hating his[/her] wife[/husband] and wanting her[/him] dead, puts poison in her[/his] coffee, thereby killing her[/him]. Joe[/Debbie] also hates his[/her] wife[/husband] and would like her[/him] dead. One day, Joe's[/Debbie's] wife[/husband] accidentally puts poison in her[/his] coffee, thinking it's cream. Joe[/Debbie] has the antidote, but he[/she] does not give it to her[/him]. Knowing that he[/she] is the only one who can save her[/him], he[/she] lets her[/him] die. Is Joe's[/Debbie's] failure to act as bad as Tom's[/Jane's] action?
A madman who has threatened to explode several bombs in crowded areas has been apprehended. Unfortunately, he has already planted the bombs and they are scheduled to go off in a short time. It is possible that hundreds of people may die. The authorities cannot make him divulge the location of the bombs by conventional methods. He refuses to say anything and requests a lawyer to protect his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination. In exasperation, some high level official suggests torture. This would be illegal, of course, but the official thinks that it is nevertheless the right thing to do in this desperate situation. Do you agree? If you do, would it also be morally justifiable to torture the mad bomber's innocent wife if that is the only way to make him talk? Why?
You are a psychiatrist and your patient has just confided to you that he intends to kill a woman. You're inclined to dismiss the threat as idle, but you aren't sure. Should you report the threat to the police and the woman or should you remain silent as the principle of confidentiality between psychiatrist and patient demands? Should there be a law that compels you to report such threats?
Jim has the responsibility of filling a position in his firm. His friend Paul has applied and is qualified, but someone else seems even more qualified. Jim wants to give the job to Paul, but he feels guilty, believing that he ought to be impartial. That's the essence of morality, he initially tells himself. This belief is, however, rejected, as Jim resolves that friendship has a moral importance that permits, and perhaps even requires, partiality in some circumstances. So he gives the job to Paul. Was he right?
A friend confides to you that he has committed a particular crime and you promise never to tell. Discovering that an innocent person has been accused of the crime, you plead with your friend to give himself up. He refuses and reminds you of your promise. What should you do? In general, under what conditions should promises be broken?
A long time Governor of a Southern State is elected President of the United States on a platform that includes strong support for laws against sexual harassment. After he is in office, it comes out that he may have used State Troopers, on duty to protect him as Governor, to pick up women for him. One of the women named in the national press stories as having been brought to the Governor for sex felt defamed because she had actually rebuffed his crude advances, even though he had said that he knew her boss -- she was a State employee. She decides to clear her name by suing the now President for sexual harassment. The Supreme Court allows the suit to proceed against the sitting President. Because the sexual harassment laws have been recently expanded, with the President's agreement, to allow testimony about the history of sexual conduct of the accused harasser, the President is questioned under oath about rumors of an affair with a young White House intern. He strongly denies that any sexual relationship had ever taken place, and professes not to remember if he was even ever alone with the intern. Later, incontrovertible evidence is introduced -- the President's own semen on the intern's dress -- that establishes the existence of the rumored sexual relationship. The President then finally admits only to an ambiguous "improper relationship." So the question is: Is it hypocritical of the President and his supporters to continued to support the sexual harassment and perjury laws if they do not want him to be subject to the ordinary penalties for breaking them?
That is a huge question for me always hanging over me.
Even though I have tried to emulate the same path, it has created a lot of sleepless nights for me. I have never fully justified my actions myself.
Musee Alsacien:
This is a museum of folk art and very small. It basically shows the Alsatian way of life with its regional traditions, designs, etc. The display included farming instruments, household and kitchen goods, costumes, furniture, paintings, wooden masks, and other mementoes belonging to different communities of Strasbourg.
This was located in 3 very old buildings which themselves are I suppose relics and worth a visit. The building is from the 14th or 15th century. I am not sure.
It is not a real big museum but more to attract the tourist population who visit Strasbourg. It was well laid out and logically takes the user around. Depicts Farm, household life, entertainment/hobbies, craft, industry and so on. One difficult thing in Strasbourg is the language. Not knowing French is a huge negative here and makes life very difficult.
Musee Archeologique:
This museum is actually in the basement of the Rohan palace and it was the most interesting for me. It actually depicts the course of Alsatian History from Prehistory to 800 AD. It is an archeological museum and depicts Sculptures of the Bronze and Iron Ages with their arms, jewelry, decorated pottery, religious sculptures, frescoes, objects of everyday life in medieval Alsace and collection of glass objects.
Musee Des Arts Decoratifs:
The museum is divided into two parts – one is representing the apartments of cardinal Rohan and the other offers a collection of decorative artifacts dating from 16th century. The apartments show the beautiful ceilings, tapestries, and other décor. Also some busts and huge paintings. Antique furnishings, (actually a huge collection), porcelain, ceramics and so on. There were also clocks from 14th century onwards and mechanical toys of the early 20th century.
Musee des Beaux-Arts:This is also in the Palace Rohan and house a very good collection of European paintings from the Middle Ages to 1870. The periods it covers are: Primitive Italian and Flemish works, Renaissance and Manierism, Baroque, Realism and Classicism in the 17th -19th centuries.
I am not at all familiar with art, but some of the names I did recognize are Goya, Boticelli and Rapheal.
Palace Rohan was built between 1732 and '42 as a residence for the Prince Bishop and was auctioned as a National Property in 1791, it was used as a Town Hall during the Revolution. In 1805, it was refurbished and used as an imperial palace by Napoleon. It was again restored and now houses three museums in it. Musee Archeologique in the basement, Musee Des Arts Decoratifs-1st floor and Musee des Beaux-Arts-2nd floor.
I did like this museum and will go back there to speak with the Curator and ask him questions. I first need to come up with what I want to ask though!!

I used to have a professor in college. He used to says "Orey, asalu jeevitamlo #enjoyment# anTe aemiTo telusaa? saayam sandhya vaela, krishnaa nadi teeraana, maaanchi #cigarette# veliginchi, #Krishna Sastry# PaaTalu vinatamu. ade raa #enjoyment# anTe!"There was an article I read a few months back or a few years back in The Outlook or in The Week (Indian Magazines) and it was pretty engrossing by talking about some What If scenarios in the context of India. I saved this article and below are the topics covered. If anyone is interested, email me and I will send you the copy.
What If
What If Netaji Came Back?
What If Indira Gandhi Had Not Declared Emergency?
What If We Were Together?
What If
What If Patel Was PM?
What If Gandhi Had Lived On?
What If Godse's Bullets Had Missed Gandhi?
What If The South Had Seceded?
What If
What If Shastri Hadn't Died Suddenly In
What If We Had Embraced
What If Ambedkar Had Converted Earlier?
What If We Had A Uniform Civil Code?
What If 'Hum Do, Hamare Do' Had Worked?
What If Reforms Had Taken Off Years Earlier?
What If There Was No Operation Bluestar?
What If Rajiv Hadn't Caved In To The Zealots?
What If Reservations Had Come To An End In ?
What If Indira was not the PM?
What If Sanjay Gandhi Had Survived The Air Crash?
What If Advani, Not Vajpayee, Had Been PM?
What If Medha Patkar Hadn't Gone To
What If Pather Panchali Hadn't Been Made?
What If Lata Had A Rival?
What If Steve Jobs Had Stayed Back In
What If AB Wasn’t ‘Inspector Vijay’?
What If Sushmita Weren’t Ms Universe?
What If Salman Rushdie Had Continued To Be A Copywriter?
What If Indira Gandhi Had Not Sent Maneka Out?
What If Sachin Hadn’t Arrived?
What If Bal Thackeray Had Remained A Full-Time Cartoonist?
What If AR Rahman Hadn’t Done
What If Yoga Hadn’t Taken Off?
What If The IT Revolution Hadn't Taken Place?
What If Amjad Khan Had Been Rejected For Gabbar's Role In Sholay?